login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
18
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Andrew Morton
Subject:
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 11:10 pm
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:49:08 -0700 Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > I repulled all the trees an hour or two ago, installed everything on > > an 8-way x86_64 box and: > > > > > > stack-protector: > > > > Testing -fstack-protector-all feature > > No -fstack-protector-stack-frame! > > -fstack-protector-all test failed > > do you have a stack-protector capable GCC? I guess not. > > This is a catch-22. You do not have stack-protector. Should we make that > a silent failure? or do you want to know that you don't have a security > feature you thought you had.... complaining seems to be the right thing to do imo.
A #warning sounds more appropriate. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:03 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Greg KH
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Dan Williams
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:24 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Thu Apr 17, 4:55 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:04 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:14 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Kay Sievers
, (Thu Apr 17, 5:48 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:12 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 6:35 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Thu Apr 17, 8:05 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 9:07 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Thu Apr 17, 10:49 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:10 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:40 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Thu Apr 17, 11:56 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:09 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:19 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pekka Enberg
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:25 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:37 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:50 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Andrew Morton
, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:28 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, James Morris
, (Fri Apr 18, 3:32 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Pavel Machek
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 4:46 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:18 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 5:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:02 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:27 am)
Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not loo ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 6:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:47 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:55 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Paul Moore
, (Fri Apr 18, 7:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Alan Stern
, (Fri Apr 18, 8:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Vegard Nossum
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)
Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not ...
, Arjan van de Ven
, (Fri Apr 18, 9:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
, Jason Wessel
, (Fri Apr 18, 2:54 pm)
2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:42 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Andrew Morton
, (Mon Apr 28, 9:59 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Mon Apr 28, 11:44 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:39 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:43 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 8:49 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Tue Apr 29, 9:58 am)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Bartlomiej Zolnierki ...
, (Tue Apr 29, 2:37 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
, Mel Gorman
, (Wed Apr 30, 4:16 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Michael Trimarchi
Re: [PATCH] VFS: make file->f_pos access atomic on 32bit arch
Miklos Szeredi
[patch 14/15] vfs: more path_permission() conversions
Serge E. Hallyn
Re: [RFC v5][PATCH 7/8] Infrastructure for shared objects
Bernd Schmidt
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Takashi Iwai
[PATCH 2/2] input: Add LED support to Synaptics device
git
:
Junio C Hamano
Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Eyvind Bernhardsen
Re: Where has "git ls-remote" reference pattern matching gone?
Shawn O. Pearce
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Todd Zullinger
Re: [PATCH 2/2] send-email: rfc2047-quote subject lines with non-ascii characters
Santi Béjar
Re: How to use git-fmt-merge-msg?
linux-netdev
:
Ramkrishna Vepa
[net-2.6 PATCH 1/10] Neterion: New driver: Driver help file
Mark Anthony
invitation / inquiry
Ingo Molnar
Re: [PATCH 08/16] dma-debug: add core checking functions
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 1/3] f_phonet: dev_kfree_skb instead of dev_kfree_skb_any in TX callback
Sascha Hauer
[PATCH 03/12] fec: do not typedef struct types
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
amba: struct device - replace bus_id with dev_name(), dev_set_name()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: Yosemite: Convert SMP startup lock to arch spinlock.
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ARM: S5PC100: IRQ and timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
davinci: edma: clear interrupt status for interrupt enabled channels only
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, mm, kprobes: fault.c, simplify notify_page_fault()
openbsd-misc
:
Daniel A. Ramaley
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Matthias Kilian
Re: can't get vesa @ 1280x800 or nv
Tobias Ulmer
Re: Problem after upgrade 4.5 to 4.6: ERR M
Philip Guenther
Re: SIGCHLD and libpthread.so
J.C. Roberts
Re: [semi-OT] Can anyone recommend an OpenBSD-compatible colour laser printer?
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate