On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:do you have a stack-protector capable GCC? I guess not. This is a catch-22. You do not have stack-protector. Should we make that a silent failure? or do you want to know that you don't have a security feature you thought you had.... complaining seems to be the right thing to do imo. -- If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc8 |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 "no CRC" MODPOST warnings |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Bill Lear | Dangers of working on a tracking branch |
| Jeff King | Re: What's cooking in git/spearce.git (topics) |
| Jason Garber | git push [rejected] question |
| Maxim Gordienko | [GIT-P4] usage under Windows |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Leon Dippenaar | New tcp stack attack |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Brandon Lee | DELL PERC 5iR slow performance |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM |
| Paul Moore | [PATCH v7 00/17] Labeled networking patches for 2.6.28 |
| Denys Vlasenko | Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images |
| Herbert Xu | Re: csum offload and af_packet |
