Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <penberg@...>, <linux-usb@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-mm@...>, <jmorris@...>, <sds@...>

Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good

Date: Thursday, April 17, 2008 - 7:40 pm

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:03:31 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text> 
> I have maybe two hours in which to weed out whatever very-recently-added
> dud patches are causing this.  Any suggestions are welcome.
> 

With git-selinux at top-of tree it's repeatably hanging in the CPA
self-tests (git-x86 stuff).  Last two lines are:

CPA self-test:
 4k 8704 large 4847 gb 0 x 0[0-0] miss 0

(clear as mud ;))

I will find the config knob to disable that test.  Of course, it could be
telling me that CPA is buggy.
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:03 pm)

2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Mon Apr 28, 12:42 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Mon Apr 28, 2:44 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:43 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 11:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 12:58 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Tue Apr 29, 5:37 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Wed Apr 30, 7:16 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 28, 12:59 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface, Mel Gorman, (Tue Apr 29, 5:39 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:50 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:53 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 7:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pavel Machek, (Fri Apr 18, 5:42 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Alan Stern, (Fri Apr 18, 11:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:18 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:09 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 2:40 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:24 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, James Morris, (Fri Apr 18, 6:32 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 18, 3:25 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:56 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 1:49 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 2:10 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:19 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 3:28 am)

Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looki..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 9:58 am)

Re: Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not l..., Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Apr 18, 12:57 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 5:28 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Thu Apr 17, 7:55 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:35 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:57 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:04 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Paul Moore, (Fri Apr 18, 10:55 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 7:40 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 8:14 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Thu Apr 17, 11:05 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 3:37 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 5:54 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 7:46 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 18, 8:34 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 8:41 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:02 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 9:22 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Jason Wessel, (Fri Apr 18, 9:27 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 10:47 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Vegard Nossum, (Fri Apr 18, 12:02 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Greg KH, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Kay Sievers, (Thu Apr 17, 8:48 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Fri Apr 18, 12:07 am)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 17, 9:12 pm)

Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good, Dan Williams, (Thu Apr 17, 7:24 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Tarkan Erimer	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Willy Tarreau	Re: Linux 2.6.21
Jan Kundrát	kswapd high CPU usage with no swap
git:

linux-netdev:
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
David Miller	Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by: