On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 18:40 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
quoted text > > > I guess you are going to push this stuff through -mm altogether, right?
> > > I can hardly take this into my tree right now, as the helpers are not in
> > > Linus' tree yet.
> >
> > yeah, sorry, that's been confusing a few people.
> >
> > Strictly I'd merge the core infrastructure and then send the dependent
> > patches into the relevant maintainers. But that can mean than we
> > needlessly miss the merge window, so it's most parctical to send along an
> > acked-by and I'll merge the dependent patch directly with the appropriate
> > ordering.
>
> I guess what Jiri (Benc) is saying that *I* should ack them, not him.
> Jiri (Benc), maybe you care to move yourself down in the maintainers
> file?
I'll resubmit a cleaned up series anyways once the unaligned access
helpers get into mainline, so don't worry too much about this set I
suppose.
Cheers,
Harvey
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH-mm 1/3] mac80211: tkip.c use get/put_unaligned ... , Harvey Harrison , (Thu Apr 17, 10:22 am)