On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:38:00 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

quoted text
> 
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Thank you whoever wrote kmemcheck.txt
> > 
> > How come slub uses one byte to track the status of each byte when
> > it could use a single bit?
> > 
> > We (still!) have not made the decision whether to proceed with slab
> > or slub.  How hard would it be to port kmemcheck into slab?
> 
> i think slab is clearly out, unless some catastrophic regression is 
> found. 

SLUB still has that several percent TPC-C regression....
Christoph has a small reproducer testcase.


-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/