Nigel Cunningham wrote:
quoted text
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 03:27 -0700, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>   
>> I guess there is the hardware / drivers issue.  I would like to claim
>> I've found hibernation to be reliable but unfortunately that's not
>> 100% true.  As you say, that's inherent to snapshotting on
>> unvirtualised hardware - calling it snapshotting instead of
>> hibernation wouldn't change anything.
>>     
>
> On a particular set of hardware, it should be possible to make it 100%
> reliable. If you've found bugs, please report them. We can only fix
> issues if we know they exist.
>   
Thanks!

I already replied to Pavels similar comment - I had posted on Bugzilla.  
I guess it missed the right people because it started off in the wrong 
category.  (The first symptom I reported was my 2.13Ghz cpu running at 
1Ghz after a sucessful hibernation cycle).  At Rafaels request, I shall 
be retesting with the latest 2.6.25-rc kernel on Saturday.  I look 
forward to getting it fixed - I know it should be possible because it's 
a regression.

Alan
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/