On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:23:38 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:How much of this has not been in -mm? How much of this has not been in linux-next? sysprof is crap. Needs documentation. This should be runtime-settable, not build-time settable. borked patch title. There were serious objections that this is weaker than and duplicative of oprofile which were not adequately addressed. Also, I (and apparently only I) actually reviewed the implementation and found it to be riddled with bugs and shortcomings. afacit this was completely ignored and you propose to merge it anwyay? I obviously don't have time to go through it all, but I'm afraid I cannot be very confident in it. All I can say is "the parts which have been in -mm seem to compile and run". A quick grep indicates that only 644 of these 884 patches are in -mm. And a lot of them only turned up a week or two ago. --
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Stoyan Gaydarov | From 2.4 to 2.6 to 2.7? |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [4/50] x86: add cpu codenames for Kconfig.cpu |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 013/196] Documentation: Replace obsolete "driverfs" with "sysfs". |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
