On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:40:51 +0200, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu> said:
quoted text >
> * Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com> wrote:
>
> > Powerpc (and ppc) have their have some code in their bitops.h which
> > used to be exacly the same as asm-generic/bitops/find.h. Include this
> > header instead.
> >
> > This should also fix the compile problems due to the generic
> > find_next_bit changes. Those were fixed by Thomas Gleixner in
> > asm-generic/bitops/find.h earlier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
>
> thanks, applied. I dropped:
>
> Subject: powerpc: fix powerpc build
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> and i'm keeping:
>
> Subject: generic: find_next_bit() fix
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> should i also drop:
>
> Subject: find_first_bit() ppc fix
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>
> ?
Yes, that problem should be fixed by my patch.
Thanks,
Alexander
quoted text > Ingo
--
Alexander van Heukelum
heukelum@fastmail.fm
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Does exactly what it says on the tin
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix find_next_bit breakage on ppc and powerpc , Alexander van Heukelum , (Wed Apr 16, 11:03 am)