Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...>, <andi-suse@...>, <hpa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <markus.t.metzger@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <roland@...>, <mtk.manpages@...>, <juan.villacis@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 - 4:51 am

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:15 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
That is true even though I see in mlock() that both are actually used.
I don't check against capabilities in perfmon, but I check RLIMIT_MEMLOCK
for the sampling buffer.

I see the capset()/capget() syscalls, however, I am still not clear as to how a
sysadmin could set up the capabilities for users via PAM or other
security interface.

I believe the patch could potentially be broken into multiple pieces:
ds/bts, pebs, ptrace.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Markus Metzger, (Tue Apr 8, 5:01 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Andrew Morton, (Tue Apr 15, 8:35 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 16, 10:47 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 16, 6:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Andi Kleen, (Wed Apr 16, 3:15 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 16, 4:51 am)