Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation optimization

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 - 1:23 am

"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:

It would be also quite possible to use two different implementations,
one for AMD another for Intel.  crypto frame work should have no
problems dealing with that.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Wed Apr 16, 12:31 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Apr 16, 1:23 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Wed Apr 16, 11:40 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Wed Apr 23, 3:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Wed Apr 23, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Fri Apr 25, 12:12 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Fri Apr 25, 12:37 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm crypto] AES: x86_64 asm implementation opti ..., Sebastian Siewior, (Tue Apr 29, 3:12 pm)