Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » April » 16

Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...>, <andi-suse@...>, <hpa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <markus.t.metzger@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>, <roland@...>, <mtk.manpages@...>, <eranian@...>, <juan.villacis@...>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 - 3:15 am

> Should we skip the RLIMIT_MEMLOCK check if capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK)?

FWIW I don't think we should. They are not really related.


The original version was much smaller -- a lot of the increase came out of
review feedback for "more infrastructure" etc. I don't think you can blame
Markus for that.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Markus Metzger, (Tue Apr 8, 5:01 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Andrew Morton, (Tue Apr 15, 8:35 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 16, 10:47 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 16, 6:59 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, Andi Kleen, (Wed Apr 16, 3:15 am)
Re: [patch 1/1] x86, ptrace: PEBS support, stephane eranian, (Wed Apr 16, 4:51 am)