On Wed 16.Apr'08 at 0:29:49 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:Ok, sorry then. I know something odd happened with bug #10117 as you so aggressively pointed out. In my defense I must say that I was about to report the hang with "ACPI: Processor [CPU1] (supports 8 throttling states)" to lkml when I read Soeren's post in this list. Then I did _not_ send the "me too" email and kept on following what was going on. So when I read that Soeren's bug was closed I wrote in the bugzilla that I was still seeing the same issue, and that I wanted to reopen it. I should not have done that and it won't happen again. You are saying it is a different problem, but it may be the same. Sometimes I had to reboot 30+ times before the hang could happen! And the last messages were _exactly_ the same. But let's not argue about that, I just wanted to help by pointing out that maybe the bug was being closed too early. In trying to help I just caused more confusion, for which I appologize. I understand now, but you made me feel bad about it. --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 006/196] Chinese: add translation of oops-tracing.txt |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc1 |
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Vladislav Bolkhovitin | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Evgeniy Polyakov | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
