> Well it would take seriously hard work to make a program that would workI can easily imagine such a program. I think you aren't exercising enough imagination about the kinds of requirements a program might be implementing. That lack of imagination (in all of us) is the reason we shouldn't tolerate something working not as designed or not as expected just because we went through every possible use scenario and it didn't matter in any of them. Just focus on the layer in question. The easiest way to imagine a program not doing locking and being useful anyway (as long as the kernel is thread-safe) is to use the same arguments you use for the kernel doing it: there's a higher level user responsible for locking. The code in question doesn't guarantee that user writes all its stuff to the right place, but at least it guarantees that that user's lack of locking doesn't screw some other user of the file. It does that by ensuring it never seeks to a place the user doesn't own and that no two separate users ever access the file at the same time. I'd even like to accomodate the poor user trying to debug the broken locking in his application. He sees the file getting corrupted and immediately thinks, "what if my thread serialization isn't working right?" But he notices that the corruption isn't consistent with that hypothesis. He knows he was working with only the beginning and the end of the file and the corruption happened in the middle. So he wastes a week considering other hypotheses, including a kernel bug, until someone points out a paragraph in the lseek() man page that says contrary to all Unix convention, that particular function and system call is not thread-safe, and it doesn't necessarily seek to the place mentioned in its argument. -- Bryan Henderson IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose CA Filesystems --
| Artem Bityutskiy | [PATCH 10/44 take 2] [UBI] debug unit implementation |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Trent Piepho | [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
| Dave Young | Re: Linux v2.6.24-rc1 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
