login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>, <linux-ide@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-pcmcia@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 - 6:03 pm

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:52:23AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Did you look at the patch?

-if ARCH_CLPS7500 || ARCH_IOP3XX || ARCH_IXP4XX || ARCH_L7200 || ARCH_LH7A40X || ARCH_PXA || ARCH_RPC || ARCH_S3C2410 || ARCH_SA1100 || ARCH_SHARK || FOOTBRIDGE
+if PCMCIA || ARCH_CLPS7500 || ARCH_IOP3XX || ARCH_IXP4XX \
+       || ARCH_L7200 || ARCH_LH7A40X || ARCH_PXA || ARCH_RPC \
+       || ARCH_S3C2410 || ARCH_SA1100 || ARCH_SHARK || FOOTBRIDGE
 source "drivers/ide/Kconfig"
 endif

So this is a only impacting ARM wrt. PCMCIA, and given that ARM supplies
an asm/ide.h, it's _entirely_ reasonable that if a platform has PCMCIA
then it supports IDE.


You could, if there was a demand for it.  As no one has added that,
I conclude that its less common for people to stick an IDE controller
into a PCI backplane.

In fact, there are only three classes of ARM platforms which have PCI
selected but not HAVE_IDE - IOP13xx, IXP2000, and Orion.  I suspect
the only reason they don't select it because they now use the ATA code
rather than the old IDE code - that's certainly true of Orion.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Mon Apr 14, 10:16 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Sam Ravnborg, (Mon Apr 14, 1:53 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Tue Apr 15, 4:15 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Tue Apr 15, 5:26 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 15, 5:23 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Tue Apr 15, 5:28 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Tue Apr 15, 5:42 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 15, 5:52 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Tue Apr 15, 6:03 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 15, 6:10 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Tue Apr 15, 6:39 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] PCMCIA mustn't select HAVE_IDE, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Tue Apr 15, 7:26 pm)
[2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Apr 17, 5:37 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Sun Apr 27, 1:53 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Thu Apr 17, 5:59 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Apr 17, 6:48 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Apr 17, 8:38 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Thu Apr 17, 7:00 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Apr 17, 9:25 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Sun Apr 27, 2:32 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Sam Ravnborg, (Sun Apr 27, 4:29 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz..., (Sun Apr 27, 5:06 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] ARM: always select HAVE_IDE, Russell King, (Sat Apr 19, 7:33 am)
speck-geostationary