> > We've previously merged ones that fit this category and have one user.I would disagree as drivers we've merged like that go on to have many users or give us new developers who stay with the project (and in some cases make projects practical to be done on Linux) One word if we are getting into the economics of this: Externalities. There are lots of benefits from merging the code beyond simple value of code merge including more developers, more reference code, more users. The ratio of new contributions to maintenance is a different problem and one I do not think should be conflated with it. But yes I do think they are different - free software is largely done for fun, by people who want to contribute. What was it John Betjeman said of another large volunteer project: "the result of the independent spirit which still survives in this country and refuses to be crushed by the money-worshippers, centralizers and the unimaginative theorists who are doing their best to kill it" Alan --
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10493] mips BCM47XX compile error |
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 02/13] syslets: add syslet.h include file, user API/ABI definitions |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 00 of 11] mmu notifier #v16 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Mark Lord | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
