In message <20080413033344.GA27494@hash.localnet>, Bob Copeland writes:[...] <IANAL> Bob, you have to be careful there; an argument like "there may not be a company to sue" may not hold. IP rights, patents and their filings, and more, can be sold, traded, transferred, inherited, etc. -- even if the original company is no longer in business. I don't know the history of ReplayTV or how it went out of business, but it might be worth a check to see if there's anyone who can still claim any rights over any part of OMFS (e.g., chapter 11 creditors who may feel they didn't get fully compensated). The irony is that as long as omfs gets little attention, no one is likely to sue; but once and if it gets into mainline and lots of Big Name Linux distros start carrying it, *then* someone may come out from the shadows to sue. </IANAL> Erez. --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| David Chinner | Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md. |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
