On Mon 2008-04-14 10:51:34, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008, David Brownell wrote:
> 
> > I sort of agree.  Looking at it from a whole-system perspective,
> > suspending needs to be able to chitchat with userspace ... and I
> > don't think that can be done *before* writing to /sys/power/state
> > in an acceptably generic/portable way.  (Briefly, applications
> > need to have clean stopping points and be able to arrange system
> > wakeup.  They may well have more work to do than most drivers.)
> 
> Pavel's recent work aside, the only way to initiate a system sleep is 
> from userspace.  So it seems natural for all application notifications 
> to be made by the initiating program, perhaps via dbus.

Actually, my plan is to do without notifications. Userspace should
tell kernel "I'm prepared, you can suspend any time now"...

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/