> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:58:40 -0500
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Quoting Manfred Spraul (
manfred@colorfullife.com):
> > > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >> On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:04:17 +0200 Manfred Spraul
> > >> <manfred@colorfullife.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> sem_undo_list **new_ulistp)
> > >>> {
> > >>> - if (unshare_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM)
> > >>> - return -EINVAL;
> > >>> + if (unshare_flags & CLONE_SYSVSEM) {
> > >>> + *new_ulistp = (void*)1;
> > >>> + }
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> And can we do anything nicer than this?
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Attached is an alternative. If you prefer it, I'll send another patch set.
> >
> > FWIW I definately far far prefer this version :)
>
> Oh, OK.
>
> I guess I'll drop what I have. Manfred, can we please have a new patchset?
>
> We might end up slipping this back to 2.6.25.1. Would that be a bad thing?