> Checked with a stock 3.2.3 form gcc.gnu.org (compiled using debian's
quoted text
> gcc-2.95). It gets it right: places that should get the C version get
> the C version and places that should get the inline-assembly version
> get the inline-assembly version. No funny things at all.

Great. Thanks for testing. Perhaps the problem was limited to 2.9x only.

quoted text
> B.T.W., debian and ubuntu don't provide gcc-3.2 packages. Is there a
> good reason why gcc-3.2.3 (5 years old in a week) should still be
> supported?

The compiler version is normally only moved up when there is some 
bug in an older version that cannot be reasonably be worked around.
So far 3.2 didn't have anything like this, at least not on x86
(on some other architectures there are problems with older toolkits) 

-Andi
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/