From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:15:30 -0700Not the intention, but anyways: The "force" is to "us" which is a group. And I imagine that newcomers will be expected to adopt these "practices". So in effect, they will be "forced" into the process changes as well. I'm getting more and more sensitive to issues on this level over time, because I realize that the fundamental issue in all human group issues is getting people to "want" to do things. And "force", in any form, tends to be incompatible with "want". And in particular, people will often even shun things they "want" when it is "forced" to them. --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Vu Pham | Re: [Scst-devel] Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Radu Rendec | Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | [PATCH 0/11] ibm_newemac: Candidate patches for 2.6.25 |
