Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Implement prctl PR_GET_TSC and PR_SET_TSC

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Monday, April 14, 2008 - 1:42 am

* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:


yep - that would be expected, as the patch only touches the 
switch_to_xtra() path so it does not actually modify any fastpath.

any effect would be random code alignment changes, or perhaps some CPU 
internal inefficiency when running with TSCs disabled (which would be 
weird but still possible).

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Implement prctl PR_GET_TSC and PR_SET_TSC, Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Apr 12, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Implement prctl PR_GET_TSC and PR_SET_TSC, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 14, 1:42 am)