From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 23:24:41 -0700I think things are improving. I wrote or merged in ~10 bugs in the last hour, for example. And I also agree with Al's point, which was embedded in his humorous and obviously sarcastic suggestions, in that adding beurocracy isn't the answer. We already have too much and it scares developers away. Sure you don't want crap getting into the tree (for too long), but it is important to be careful to define crap properly. For example, inundating patch submitters with more requirements, especially ones involving automatons like checkpatch, is in the end bad. We can improve the quality of stuff going in and be flexible at the same time. --
| Kok, Auke | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 - ioat/dma engine |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Matthew Garrett | [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
