Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>
Date: Monday, April 14, 2008 - 2:19 am

On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 03:00:53PM -0700, Davide Libenzi wrote:

Adding a duplicated API like this is rather pointless.  Especially as
the readlink is easier and makes more sense.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Davide Libenzi, (Sun Apr 13, 6:00 pm)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Christoph Hellwig, (Mon Apr 14, 2:19 am)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Apr 14, 1:34 pm)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Apr 14, 10:48 am)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Apr 14, 7:44 am)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Arnd Bergmann, (Sun Apr 13, 9:00 pm)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Davide Libenzi, (Sun Apr 13, 9:41 pm)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Michael Kerrisk, (Mon Apr 14, 1:34 am)
Re: [patch] F_GETPATH for linux, Davide Libenzi, (Mon Apr 14, 1:42 pm)