Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:Well less shit would happen if developers would take the time to at least test their patches before they were submitted. It like we will just have the poor user do our testing for us. What kind of testing do developers do. I been a linux user and have followed the LKML for a number of years and have yet to see any test plans for any submitted patches. My $.02 Steve Clark -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson) --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.26-rc4 |
| Fred . | Please add ZFS support (from GPL sources) |
| Greg KH | Linux 2.6.25.10 |
git: | |
| Alexander Gladysh | [Q] Encrypted GIT? |
| Kevin Leung | Edit log message after commit |
| Pietro Mascagni | GIT vs Other: Need argument |
| Michael Hendricks | removing content from git history |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Edwin Eyan Moragas | poll(2) vs kqueue(2) performance |
| Didier Wiroth | win32-codecs, avi and amd64 question |
| Daniel Ouellet | identifying sparse files and get ride of them trick available? |
| Daniel Brewer | Re: fsync performance hit on 1.6.1 |
| Hubert Feyrer | Compressed vnd handling tested successfully |
| Elad Efrat | Integrating securelevel and kauth(9) |
| YAMAMOTO Takashi | yamt-km branch |
