On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:No. I mean never ever remove the *configure* level thinking that "e1000 is e1000". There is no sense in *ever* showing it as two drivers to users, because users do not see them as separate chipsets. They look identical, down to the part names. If it's a single family, and users can't even easily tell whether they have version 1 or version 2 (PCI vs PCI-E), you shouldn't even ask them. You should literally ask them: "do you want e1000 support". That's it. Once you have asked them that, you can then decide "ok, if you *really* know what version of the chip you have, you can decide to only get limited driver support". But that's a secondary thing from a user perspective. See the patch I already sent out. Linus --
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default |
| Tejun Heo | [PATCHSET] FUSE: extend FUSE to support more operations |
| Avi Kivity | [PATCH 041/104] KVM: Don't assign vcpu->cr3 if it's invalid: check first, set last |
| Vegard Nossum | [RFC][PATCH] bitfields API |
git: | |
| Rogan Dawes | Re: kernel.org mirroring (Re: [GIT PULL] MMC update) |
| David Kastrup | Terminology question about remote branches. |
| Tony Stubbs | git svn rebase - could not detach HEAD |
| Nicolas Pitre | Re: Understanding version 4 packs |
| James Hartley | scp batch mode? |
| Firas Kraiem | Possible mug in mini_sendmail-chroot. |
| Gregory Edigarov | Question on interface enumeration |
| bsd_news | LC_COLLATE and PostgreSQL |
| Jeff Garzik | Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: remove network drivers' last few uses of IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM |
| Jay Vosburgh | [PATCH 6/9] net/bonding: Handlle wrong assumptions that slave is always an Etherne... |
| Radu Rendec | Re: Endianness problem with u32 classifier hash masks |
| Robert Olsson | [PATCH] pktgen multiqueue etc |
