Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben@...>, Vincent Sanders <vince@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, April 13, 2008 - 3:08 pm

On 13/04/2008, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
But, you are completely ignoring the case of "the code is unused, but
will probably be used soon, so I'll just leave it alone and avoid the
churn".  Why? What's the point of commenting it out now and then
enabling it again in a month or two - isn't that just pointless churn?




-- 
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Don't top-post  http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please      http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 13, 2:15 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Apr 13, 2:55 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 13, 3:03 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Apr 13, 3:08 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 13, 3:24 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Apr 13, 3:34 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 13, 3:47 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Jesper Juhl, (Sun Apr 13, 3:53 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Dmitri Vorobiev, (Sun Apr 13, 3:32 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] mfd/sm501.c: #if 0 unused functions, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Apr 13, 3:43 pm)