On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:53:48PM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:Nice turn of a phrase, that. Oh, for the... "Allow" is such a nice word, isn't it? Let's take a closer look: * nobody prohibits lines satisfying your constraints ("tabs only for indent level"), so "allowing" that is meaningless * "indentation style" in the above refers to editor settings. To "allow" that, you advocate prohibiting the lines _NOT_ satisfying your constraints. Which, by definition, means extra work for people submitting patches, no matter how you spin it. BTW, while we are talking about conventions, would you mind keeping lines in your mail shorter than 79 columns to avoid wraparounds in quoted text? Unlike your proposal, that one actually _is_ a common convention... --
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.27-rc5 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Kamalesh Babulal | [Build Failure] 2.6.25-rc5-mm1 Build fails with allmodconfig probe_4drives undefined |
| Gabriel C | Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1 |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
git: | |
