login
Header Space

 
 

[rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected))

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, H. Anvin <hpa@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...>
Date: Sunday, April 13, 2008 - 3:58 am

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:


thanks Rafael for bisecting this!

This was a rather nasty problem - and i'm wondering what else we could 
do to harden our hw resource management code. I'm wondering, is there 
any particular reason why clearly broken resource setup is not detected 
somewhere, automatically, and WARN_ON()-ed about?

for example, in the scheduler code we used to have similar bug patterns 
again and again: architecture code set up scheduler domains incorrectly 
and broke the system in subtle ways. So we added sched_domain_debug() 
which is active under CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y and does a few sanity checks 
and complains if something is wrong. This caught quite a few bugs 
whenever the sched-domains code was modified.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 3:59 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:51 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 6:27 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 2:43 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:13 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 4:25 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:29 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:38 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 6:28 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 3:26 pm)
[rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tree br..., Ingo Molnar, (Sun Apr 13, 3:58 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tre..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 11:48 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Andi Kleen, (Sun Apr 13, 5:39 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:19 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Andi Kleen, (Sun Apr 13, 2:29 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 3:29 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 11:52 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 1:01 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Apr 14, 10:12 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 2:11 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 1:53 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Sun Apr 13, 3:51 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 3:59 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:51 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 4:24 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 12:12 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 6:00 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 6:10 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 6:32 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 8:19 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 9:42 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 14, 4:21 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 5:06 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 14, 5:09 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 5:36 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 14, 5:16 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 2:08 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 7:41 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Apr 13, 7:45 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 8:09 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Apr 13, 8:12 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:07 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 2:47 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:54 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:53 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 4:41 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 12:14 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 14, 5:02 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 5:11 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 5:21 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 5:31 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:23 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:29 pm)
speck-geostationary