2.6.25-rc8-mm2 - CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY broke again...

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Saturday, April 12, 2008 - 4:52 am

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:33:54 PDT, Andrew Morton said:

OK, I found the issue I was chasing when I noticed the WARN from genapic_64.c.

After seeing that I'd gotten all the way to remove-div_long_long_rem.patch I
took a close look at the remaining several dozen patches, and took a wild
stab in the dark.. .and ta-da...

PROFILE_LIKELY broke between -rc8-mm1 and -rc8-mm2.  Setting it to 'y'
gets me an instant reboot similar to what I was seeing against -rc2-mm.

And changed between -mm1 and -mm2 (datestamp of 04/08):

patches/profile-likely-unlikely-macros.patch
patches/profile-likely-unlikely-macros-fix.patch

I found the profile-likely-unlikely-macros-fix-2.patch from last time around,
but the code has changed a bunch since then so it isn't a clean apply (and in
fact, it's so different it's not even easily hand-patchable - stuff like
!!(foo) has appeared).
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Thu Apr 10, 11:33 pm)
BUG at __dentry_open [Was: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2], Jiri Slaby, (Mon Apr 14, 4:07 am)
2.6.25-rc8-mm2 - CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY broke again..., , (Sat Apr 12, 4:52 am)
2.6.25-rc8-mm2, , (Sat Apr 12, 5:41 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 1:53 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 1:57 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: FIX kmalloc-2048 (was Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 4:05 pm)
atl1 64-bit =&gt; 32-bit DMA borkage (reproducible, bisected), Alexey Dobriyan, (Sat Apr 19, 10:45 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: IP: [&lt;ffffffff802868f9&gt;] __kmalloc..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Apr 14, 2:00 pm)
[mm patch] select ATA_SFF, Adrian Bunk, (Sat Apr 12, 8:51 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 5:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 6:23 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 11, 6:34 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 6:57 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 7:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Apr 11, 9:17 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Pekka Enberg, (Fri Apr 11, 10:24 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Sun Apr 13, 11:13 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Apr 11, 9:40 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Sat Apr 12, 12:22 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Aneesh Kumar K.V, (Sat Apr 12, 2:43 pm)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Michael Schmitz, (Sun Apr 13, 3:45 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sun Apr 13, 4:11 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, , (Sat Apr 12, 1:53 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2, Andrew Morton, (Sat Apr 12, 2:07 am)
Re: 2.6.25-rc8-mm2: Observed problems: Not a detailed bug re..., Rafael J. Wysocki, (Tue Apr 15, 4:12 pm)