On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Bongani Hlope wrote:Interesting. That commit _should_ have just moved code around with no actual semantic changes. Can you verify that undoing just that one commit makes current git (-rc9) work for you? Ie just try a git revert 266c2e0abeca649fa6667a1a427ad1da507c6375 on top of the current tree. I just want to check, because even after looking at that diff again, I'm not seeing what it could actually change. Linus --
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Andi Kleen | Please pull ACPI updates |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Fred . | Please add ZFS support (from GPL sources) |
git: | |
| Theodore Ts'o | Any objectsions to enhancing git-log to show tags/branch heads? |
| Alex R.M. Turner | Re: Problem with a push |
| Sebastian Schuberth | git on Cygwin: Not a valid object name HEAD |
| Dan Farina | backup or mirror a repository |
| Theo de Raadt | That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing |
| Jeff Ross | U320 Drive on U160 controller? |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Bertram Scharpf | First install: Grub doesn't find partitions |
| Jim Winstead Jr. | Re: Root Disk/Book Disk Compatibility |
| Desmond A. Kirkpatrick | ATI GUP bug with Linux 'tickler' |
| erc | HARDWARE COMPATIBILITY LIST |
| L.G. Ted Stern | Psfrag.sty in TeX, ext2fs |
