login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
11
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Krzysztof Halasa
Subject:
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
Date: Friday, April 11, 2008 - 1:22 pm
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
quoted text
> Nobody wants to care deeply whether it's a PCI-E or PCI chip. In fact, > it's almost impossible to tell. Here, quickly, tell me which one mine is > (this is from /sbin/lspci): > > 00:19.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82566DM Gigabit Network Connection (rev 02) > > and tell me how you knew..
I guess PCIE. You already came across a similar problem. Have I won something? :-) -- Krzysztof Halasa --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 11:39 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:32 pm)
RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Brandeburg, Jesse
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:43 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:51 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 12:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:04 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:06 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Dan Noe
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:12 pm)
showing which hardware is unclaimed
, Rick Jones
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:13 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:17 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:19 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:20 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Kok, Auke
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:31 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:33 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: showing which hardware is unclaimed
, Martin Mares
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Martin Mares
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:36 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Dan Noe
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:39 pm)
Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Kok, Auke
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Tue Apr 8, 1:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:12 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Jeff Garzik
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:33 pm)
[patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regr ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Wed Apr 9, 12:50 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:04 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:12 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Frans Pop
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Wed Apr 9, 1:53 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Wed Apr 9, 4:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Bill Davidsen
, (Wed Apr 9, 5:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Wed Apr 9, 6:40 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:57 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu Apr 10, 7:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Grant Grundler
, (Thu Apr 10, 10:55 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:04 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Linus Torvalds
, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Chris Friesen
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:20 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:23 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ...
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:35 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Randy Dunlap
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:44 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Philip Craig
, (Thu Apr 10, 5:46 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Andi Kleen
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:54 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:59 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:36 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Fri Apr 11, 5:16 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Chris Friesen
, (Fri Apr 11, 8:40 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Fri Apr 11, 9:22 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Fri Apr 11, 9:45 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Martin Mares
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:10 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Kok, Auke
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:34 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 11:51 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Willy Tarreau
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:25 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000
, Willy Tarreau
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Matthew Wilcox
, (Fri Apr 11, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Krzysztof Halasa
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:22 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 1:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Dan Noe
, (Fri Apr 11, 2:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 3:06 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Fri Apr 11, 3:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:00 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:05 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Daniel Barkalow
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:15 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Jeff Garzik
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:43 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, david
, (Fri Apr 11, 4:58 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Christoph Hellwig
, (Sat Apr 12, 6:07 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Linus Torvalds
, (Sun Apr 13, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ondrej Zary
, (Sun Apr 13, 2:34 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jun 9, 12:24 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Paul Turner
[tg_shares_up rewrite v4 11/11] sched: update tg->shares after cpu.shares write
Mr. James W. Laferriere
Re: Linux 2.6.25-rc1 , syntax error near unexpected token `;'
Chuck Ebbert
Re: PCI: Unable to reserve mem region problem
Linus Torvalds
Linux 2.6.34-rc4
David Miller
Re: 'global' rq->clock
git
:
Ralf Wildenhues
[PATCH] Fix typos in the documentation
Len Brown
Re: fatal: unable to create '.git/index': File exists
Oliver Hoffmann
git init --bare versus git --bare init
Sam Vilain
Re: RFC: Flat directory for notes, or fan-out? Both!
Ilari Liusvaara
Re: git access using SSL certificates
openbsd-misc
:
Sevan / Venture37
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Netmaffia.hu
Tini Lányok AKCIÓBAN OTTHON
Siju George
This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Darrin Chandler
Re: OT: Python (was Re: vi in /bin)
Gilles Chehade
Re: Longest Uptime?
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ASoC: fix registration of the SoC card in the Freescale MPC8610 drivers
Linux Kernel Mailing List
drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List
nfsd41: sanity check client drc maxreqs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
bnx2x: Moving includes
Linux Kernel Mailing List
[CIFS] if get root inode fails during mount, cleanup tree connection
linux-netdev
:
Kurt Van Dijck
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6 1/2] can: add driver for Softing card
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH net-next-2.6] net: Introduce skb_orphan_try()
Jamie Lokier
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performa...
David Miller
Re: [PATCH v2] net: typos in comments in include/linux/igmp.h
Ramachandra K
Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 10/13] QLogic VNIC: Driver Statistics collection
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate