On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:07:55PM +0100, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 09:53:26AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 14:58:40 +0100 Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > The originally suggested layout was:
> > > 
> > > 			printk(
> > > "Oh ....",
> > > 				a, b);
> > 
> > Dunno about others, but when I see that idiom I fall over stunned and 
> > can't get up again.
> 
> That remains me of nethack.  I'll start with the width breaker.

Ok.  I've just pushed out a testing version of checkpatch which is
identicle the 0.18 delta I just pushed to Andrew with the printk width
restriction lifted.  Perhaps those interested might test it to see if it
whines appropriatly:

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

I am going to be off next week, but will likely be dipping into email
now and again.

-apw
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/