> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:19:17AM -0400, Mark Lord (
lkml@rtr.ca) wrote:
>>>> Or I can ignore it, like the net developers, since I have a workaround.
>>>> And then we'll see what other apps are broken upon 2.6.25 final release.
>> That's not demanding, that's quite relaxed. I had a good workaround,
>> and didn't really care any more at that point. Just though it was rather
>> odd that none of the developers seemed interested in tracking it down.
>> I offered tons of help, gave it, and said I didn't have time for a full
>> bisect at that juncture.
>>
>> For that, I get repeatedly slammed by the netdev folks.
>> Even after I put aside *paid* work to submit to your demands.
>>
>> Next time around, I won't bother reporting bugs to you folks,
>> that's for damned sure.
>
> Actually that will be the best decision from evolutional point of view.
>
> Bugs, which 'are thrown back to your face' like what you did with this
> one, are useless. Developers already know, that bugs exist.
>
> If you do not care about bug, why do you ever bothered filling it?
