On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
Peter,
I've been testing this patch. Above you seemed to be saying that
doing a sched_yield() would be equivalent to a sleep, causing the rt
counter to be reset to zero. Howver, the results I'm seeing suggest
that a sched_yield() does not cause the counter to be reset to zero
(i.e., despite calling sched_yield() at frequent intervals, the
process still encounters the RLIM_RTTIME soft limit and gets SIGXCPU).
Can you comment?
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Maintainer of the Linux man-pages project
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Want to report a man-pages bug? Look here:
http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--