David Miller wrote:.. Absolutely, though to a varying degree. That's the responsibility that goes with the role of a subsystem maintainer. I once had such a role, and gave it up when I felt I could no longer keep up. You still keep refering to it as "your (my) bug". It's not. I had nothing to do with it, other than stumbling over it. When people stumble over a libata bug, I look hard to see if my code could possibly cause it. Jeff looks even harder, because he's the current subsystem dude for libata. I never suggest a user search through a mountain of unrelated commits for something I've screwed up on. I give more directed help, patches to collect more relevant information, and patches to try and resolve it. The last thing I'd ever do, is diss the reporter. Regards. --
| David Miller | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Kamalesh Babulal | Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| bcpa | Binkley/Rfmaill/Cnews scripts?.. |
| Dong Liu | Re: CXterm for LINUX |
| Rogier Wolff | Re: MIPS R3000 board to run Linux, anyone? |
| Theodore Ts'o | The patch to buffer.c seems to work! |
