From: Tilman Schmidt
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:56:49 +0200> I think you got it backwards. Mark and other bug reporters (including,
I appreciate the bug reports, believe me.
The issue is which of the limited developer resources get put onto
which bugs.
A developer who does this for fun is going to prioritize to things
that are pleasant and interesting to work on, and also a good
effective use of their time.
So people prioritize.
Therefore, my point is, the net result is that user have a direct
influence on which bugs get worked on with the highest priority and
thus get fixed faster. And those are the ones that have the most
information available, and in particular bisec results when
appropriate.
--
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: [PATCH RFC] x86: check for and defend against BIOS memory corruption |
| Frederik Deweerdt | [-mm patch] remove tcp header from tcp_v4_check (take #2) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Herbert Xu | Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching |
git: | |
