From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:56:49 +0200I appreciate the bug reports, believe me. The issue is which of the limited developer resources get put onto which bugs. A developer who does this for fun is going to prioritize to things that are pleasant and interesting to work on, and also a good effective use of their time. So people prioritize. Therefore, my point is, the net result is that user have a direct influence on which bugs get worked on with the highest priority and thus get fixed faster. And those are the ones that have the most information available, and in particular bisec results when appropriate. --
| David Miller | Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Fixing the Kernel Janitors project |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO |
| Mark Lord | Re: 2.6.25-rc8: FTP transfer errors |
| Kamalesh Babulal | Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Alexey Dobriyan | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| bcpa | Binkley/Rfmaill/Cnews scripts?.. |
| Dong Liu | Re: CXterm for LINUX |
| Rogier Wolff | Re: MIPS R3000 board to run Linux, anyone? |
| Theodore Ts'o | The patch to buffer.c seems to work! |
