otDavid Miller schrieb:
I think you got it backwards. Mark and other bug reporters (including,
at times, yours truly) are helping you and other developers to make
Linux better. Most of the times I report a bug, I am not asking for help
- I have no personal need to get it fixed, as I can easily avoid it, and
I only report it to give developers like you a chance to fix it before
it really hurts someone - and I gather that Mark has been in a similar
position wrt to the bug in question.
So what would you have us do? Not report the bugs we find so that you
don't have to invest your spare time on "our" bugs? Report them and
accept a rebuke for our "unwillingness" to do even more benevolent work
than we already did? Report only those for which we really need a fix,
and are consequently willing to invest additional time?
Thanks,
Tilman
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| David Woodhouse | [PATCH 1/3] firmware: allow firmware files to be built into kernel image |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21 |
| Parag Warudkar | BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 15s! [swapper:0] |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
