On 11/04/2008, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:So this was indeed a case of "I didn't get it", that's good ;-) I know that lack of developers is a problem and that the more users (especially capable ones) help the better. Aparently I misunderstood the post and read it as really saying "if users don't want to do the work then we don't want the bug reports" and that's what made me react. Sure, when things can be done that way that is the best approach, sure. I know. Again I can''t do anything but agree with you. You are right. When it's possible to do the work this way everyone wins. I was just trying to say that when it can't be done that way or the user won't, then the bug report still has value and still deserves to be taken seriously (although it probably goes lower in the pile than the bugs where the end users actually do bisect or whatever). -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html --
| Bart Van Assche | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
