On 10/04/2008, Tilman Schmidt <tilman@imap.cc> wrote: <...>I hope that was a joke and that I just don't get it. Are you really saying that if somebody find a bug they shouldn't bother reporting it unless they are willing to spend hours and hours of work to get it fixed? The way I see it, the burden of debugging and fixing bugs is mainly on the developers of the code that breaks. You can't blame users for using the code, triggering bugs and then reporting the breakage. Users who report bugs are doing us all a great service regardless of their ability or willingness to do more work than just the initial report. If bugs don't get reported they'll never get fixed. Even a bad bug report with no follow up at all still allows us to use it to gauge how often a specific bug is being hit and thus how important it may be to fix it. You can't expect users to know how to debug a problem or even bisect it. A user may not even be able to compile a custom kernel but she may still hit a bug and do us the favour of reporting it. It should be the job of the developer of the code to investigate the bug following a users report. Sure it's great when users can bisect, provide test cases, debug the problem completely themselves or even provide a patch, but you can't expect that. And in my oppinion you certainly can't just hide behind "the user doesn't want to bisect so I won't fix this" and use that as an excuse for the code being buggy. I hope most people take bug reports more seriously than that. When people discover bugs in my own code I thank them and feel a bit ashamed that I didn't do my work properly and it then becomes very important to me to make sure I squash the bug. The more the user can help the better, but if they cannot help beyond telling me what broke and how, then that's fine too. I still want to nail the bug and I'll just have to do more work myself, but it becomes a matter of personal and professional pride to hunt down the bug. We need to be grateful to users who report bugs - most of them don't bother. -- Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] Stop pmac_zilog from abusing 8250's device numbers. |
| Mitch Bradley | Re: [PATCH 1/2] OLPC: Add support for calling into Open Firmware |
| Anders | PROBLEM: high load average when idle |
git: | |
| Elijah Newren | Trying to use git-filter-branch to compress history by removing large, obsolete bi... |
| Linus Torvalds | irc usage.. |
| Luke Lu | git-svn questions: how to clone/init non-standard layout branches/tags? |
| Alex Riesen | Re: git-fast-import |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Todd Pytel | IDE or SCSI virtual disks for VMWare image? |
| Chris Tankersley | Dell PERC 3/Di - No Disks Found |
| Sam Fourman Jr. | Asus Striker Extreme does not support 4GB memory |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: Splitting comp.os.linux |
| David Gabrius | Re: NT vs Linux (was: Re: truth or dare) |
| Doug Evans | Re: Stabilizing Linux |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: demand paging: proposal |
| magical mounts | 12 hours ago | Linux kernel |
| Problem in scim in Fedora 9 | 13 hours ago | Linux general |
| The new Western Digital power saving drives | 13 hours ago | Hardware |
| Battery Maximizer Software | 1 day ago | Linux kernel |
| windows folder creation surprise | 1 day ago | Windows |
| Firewall | 2 days ago | OpenBSD |
| IP layer send packet | 2 days ago | Linux kernel |
| dtrace for linux available | 3 days ago | Linux kernel |
| Unable to mount ramdisk image using UBoot while upgrading to 2.6.15 kernel for a MPC8540 based target | 3 days ago | Linux kernel |
| RealTek RTL8169 - can't connect | 3 days ago | NetBSD |
