Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

To: Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@...>

Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@...>, Grant Grundler <grundler@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...>, Frans Pop <elendil@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <jeff@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <e1000-devel@...>, <linux-pci@...>, <akpm@...>, <davem@...>, <jesse.brandeburg@...>, <john.ronciak@...>, <bruce.w.allan@...>, <greg@...>, <arjan@...>, <rjw@...>

Subject: Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix

Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 5:20 pm

Kok, Auke wrote:

quoted text> We want to move users over to e1000e, because with 2.6.26 they must (or at one
> point in time anyway).
> 
> I'm all for making the move easier, but I'm really against prolonging these hacks
> that make people just bump their noses later. If they hit the problem now instead
> of when 2.6.26 ships, then it's all for the better IMHO.

Obviously e1000e hasn't been out for long enough to become common 
knowledge.  (Both Ingo and Linus running into the problem is probably a 
sign...)

Maybe it would make sense to have "e1000 implies setting e1000e to the 
same as e1000" for a couple releases, so that word gets around a bit 
more.  Then you can remove the auto-select of e1000e and anyone that 
hasn't updated by then will get bit.

Chris
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 t..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 2:39 pm)

RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Apr 8, 3:43 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 3:59 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 4:04 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 4:17 pm)

showing which hardware is unclaimed, Rick Jones, (Tue Apr 8, 4:13 pm)

Re: showing which hardware is unclaimed, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 4:35 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 4:12 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 4:20 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 4:39 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 4:35 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 4:36 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 3:32 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e10..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 3:51 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Apr 9, 8:52 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 4:59 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 3:56 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 4:06 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 4:31 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 3:12 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 3:33 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 7:30 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Chris Friesen, (Fri Apr 11, 11:40 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 3:29 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 4:19 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 4:33 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 4:56 pm)

[patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re:..., Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 3:38 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Frans Pop, (Wed Apr 9, 4:49 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Wed Apr 9, 7:59 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Apr 9, 9:40 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 5:57 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 10:30 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 5:35 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Grant Grundler, (Thu Apr 10, 1:55 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 3:27 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was:..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Apr 10, 2:04 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:26 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Chris Friesen, (Thu Apr 10, 5:20 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Wed Apr 9, 4:12 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:29 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 3:27 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 5:23 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 7:26 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 7:36 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 8:16 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 12:22 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Martin Mares, (Fri Apr 11, 1:10 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 12:45 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 1:34 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 6:06 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 7:00 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 7:43 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Apr 13, 5:13 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 9, 3:24 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ondrej Zary, (Sun Apr 13, 5:34 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Apr 12, 9:07 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, , (Fri Apr 11, 7:58 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 7:15 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 6:21 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 7:05 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 1:53 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 2:51 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Dan Noe, (Fri Apr 11, 5:01 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Apr 11, 4:22 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 4:29 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 3:01 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 4:21 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 3:25 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 3:38 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 1:26 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Philip Craig, (Thu Apr 10, 8:46 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 10, 5:44 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Andi Kleen, (Fri Apr 11, 3:54 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 5:52 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 4:53 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 3:50 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 4:04 pm)

Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 4:47 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg KH	[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
david	Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

Rob Landley	What still uses the block layer?
git:

linux-netdev:
Antonio Almeida	HTB accuracy for high speed
Alexey Dobriyan	Re: [GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
openbsd-misc:

Colocation donated by:

Online users

partygirl

Syndicate