login
Header Space

 
 

Re: x86 git tree broken

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, H. Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 4:51 pm

* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:


i used your config on an AMD system here and s2ram works just fine, both 
using CONFIG_PM_TEST_SUSPEND=y bootup suspend self-test [which x86.git 
QA uses all the time], and using a manual pm-suspend command at the 
console.

you can also try your luck and remove the last 20% of x86.git [which is 
always the newest stuff], by picking a commit 200 patches down the line, 
via:

 git-rev-list x86/base..x86/latest | head -200 | tail -1

and testing that. If that tree works, it's the last 200 commits that 
break stuff.

exactly what kind of system are you using? If you revert the trampoline 
changes, does it get any better - but i guess it might be better to do a 
bisection.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 3:59 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:51 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 6:27 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 2:43 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:13 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 4:25 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:29 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 4:38 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Thu Apr 10, 6:28 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 3:26 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks (was: Re: x86 git tre..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 11:48 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Andi Kleen, (Sun Apr 13, 5:39 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:19 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Andi Kleen, (Sun Apr 13, 2:29 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 3:29 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 11:52 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 1:01 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Mon Apr 14, 10:12 am)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 2:11 pm)
Re: [rfc] hw resource debugging checks, Arjan van de Ven, (Sun Apr 13, 1:53 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Sun Apr 13, 3:51 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 3:59 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:51 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 4:24 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 12:12 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 6:00 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 6:10 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 6:32 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 8:19 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 9:42 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 14, 4:21 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 5:06 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Apr 14, 5:09 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 5:36 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 14, 5:16 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Mon Apr 14, 2:08 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 7:41 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Apr 13, 7:45 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 8:09 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), H. Peter Anvin, (Sun Apr 13, 8:12 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:07 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 2:47 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:54 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 2:53 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Sun Apr 13, 4:41 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Sun Apr 13, 12:14 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Ingo Molnar, (Mon Apr 14, 5:02 am)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 5:11 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 5:21 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Yinghai Lu, (Fri Apr 11, 5:31 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:23 pm)
Re: x86 git tree broken (bisected), Rafael J. Wysocki, (Fri Apr 11, 4:29 pm)
speck-geostationary