nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <neilb@...>, <Trond.Myklebust@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-nfs@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 3:51 pm

Another infinite loop, this one involving both client and server.

Basically what happens is that on the server nlm_fopen() calls
nfsd_open() which returns -EACCES, to which nlm_fopen() returns
NLM_LCK_DENIED.

On the client this will turn into a -EAGAIN (nlm_stat_to_errno()),
which in will cause fcntl_setlk() to retry forever.

I _think_ the solution is to turn NLM_LCK_DENIED into ENOLCK for
blocking locks, as NLM_LCK_BLOCKED is for the contended case.  For
testing the lock leave NLM_LCK_DENIED as EAGAIN.  That still could be
misleading, but at least there's no infinite loop in that case.

I've minimally tested this patch to verify that it cures the lockup,
and that simple blocking locks keep working.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
---
 fs/lockd/clntproc.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Index: linux/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/fs/lockd/clntproc.c	2008-04-02 13:34:57.000000000 +0200
+++ linux/fs/lockd/clntproc.c	2008-04-10 21:23:46.000000000 +0200
@@ -536,6 +536,9 @@ again:
 		up_read(&host->h_rwsem);
 	}
 	status = nlm_stat_to_errno(resp->status);
+	/* Don't return EAGAIN, as that would make fcntl_setlk() loop */
+	if (status == -EAGAIN)
+		status = -ENOLCK;
 out_unblock:
 	nlmclnt_finish_block(block);
 	/* Cancel the blocked request if it is still pending */

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Apr 10, 3:51 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Trond Myklebust, (Thu Apr 10, 5:02 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Trond Myklebust, (Thu Apr 10, 5:07 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Trond Myklebust, (Thu Apr 10, 5:20 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Thu Apr 10, 5:54 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Apr 13, 4:28 am)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Mon Apr 14, 1:19 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Mon Apr 14, 5:15 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Tue Apr 15, 2:58 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Wed Apr 16, 12:28 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Thu Apr 17, 6:26 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Apr 18, 8:47 am)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Apr 11, 3:12 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Sat Apr 12, 8:08 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Apr 13, 4:13 am)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Mon Apr 14, 1:07 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), J. Bruce Fields, (Fri Apr 11, 3:19 pm)
Re: nfs: infinite loop in fcntl(F_SETLKW), Miklos Szeredi, (Fri Apr 11, 3:22 pm)