Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » April » 10

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Kok, Auke
Subject: Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 11:26 am

[Empty message]
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 11:39 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 12:32 pm)
RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Apr 8, 12:43 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 12:51 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 12:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 12:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 1:04 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:06 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 1:12 pm)
showing which hardware is unclaimed, Rick Jones, (Tue Apr 8, 1:13 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:17 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 1:19 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 1:20 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 1:31 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:33 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: showing which hardware is unclaimed, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 1:36 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 1:39 pm)
Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 1:47 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 1:56 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 12:12 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 12:33 pm)
[patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regr ..., Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 12:50 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 1:04 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Wed Apr 9, 1:12 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Frans Pop, (Wed Apr 9, 1:49 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 1:53 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Wed Apr 9, 4:59 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Apr 9, 5:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Apr 9, 6:40 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 2:57 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 7:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Grant Grundler, (Thu Apr 10, 10:55 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Apr 10, 11:04 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 11:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 11:29 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Chris Friesen, (Thu Apr 10, 2:20 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:23 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 2:35 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 10, 2:44 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Philip Craig, (Thu Apr 10, 5:46 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Andi Kleen, (Fri Apr 11, 12:54 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 1:59 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 4:30 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 4:36 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 5:16 am)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Chris Friesen, (Fri Apr 11, 8:40 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 9:22 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 9:45 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Martin Mares, (Fri Apr 11, 10:10 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 10:26 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 10:34 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 10:53 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 11:51 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 12:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 12:25 pm)
Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 12:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 12:38 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 1:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Apr 11, 1:22 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 1:29 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Dan Noe, (Fri Apr 11, 2:01 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 3:06 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 3:21 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 4:00 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 4:05 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 4:15 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 4:43 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, david, (Fri Apr 11, 4:58 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Apr 12, 6:07 am)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Apr 13, 2:13 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ondrej Zary, (Sun Apr 13, 2:34 pm)
Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 9, 12:24 pm)