I don't know how I should understand your statement. Does this only
comment on my suggestion to send it to the patch system or on the patch
itself?
After Hans-Jürgen addressed your concerns about the order in
arch/arm/Kconfig compared to drivers/Kconfig there was no addional
feedback (apart from the discussion about including drivers/Kconfig in
arch/arm/Kconfig).
I consider the patch good until arch/arm/Kconfig includes
drivers/Kconfig (if ever).
As it is a while that the discussion took place, here is the thread in
the archive:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20080207.125824.348cd1bd.en.html
and the following post includes the last version of the patch:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20080207.131236.8c4f4569.en.html
Best regards
Uwe
--
Uwe Kleine-König, Software Engineer
Digi International GmbH Branch Breisach, Küferstrasse 8, 79206 Breisach, Germany
Tax: 315/5781/0242 / VAT: DE153662976 / Reg. Amtsgericht Dortmund HRB 13962
--