Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000) | KernelTrap

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000)

view
thread

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: Krzysztof Halasa

Subject: Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000)

Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 2:57 am

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:

quoted text>> Nope, udev with normal distro config will load e1000e just fine.
>
> Not for us that don't compile modules at all, or only modules for the 
> devices we actually have.

That would work, too.
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 11:39 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 12:32 pm)

RE: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Brandeburg, Jesse, (Tue Apr 8, 12:43 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 12:51 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 12:56 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 12:59 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 1:04 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:06 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 1:12 pm)

showing which hardware is unclaimed, Rick Jones, (Tue Apr 8, 1:13 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000 (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] e ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:17 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 1:19 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Apr 8, 1:20 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 1:31 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:33 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)

Re: showing which hardware is unclaimed, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 1:35 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Martin Mares, (Tue Apr 8, 1:36 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Dan Noe, (Tue Apr 8, 1:39 pm)

Re: [E1000-devel] [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Kok, Auke, (Tue Apr 8, 1:47 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Apr 8, 1:56 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 12:12 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 12:33 pm)

[patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [regr ..., Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 12:38 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Apr 9, 12:50 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 1:04 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Wed Apr 9, 1:12 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Frans Pop, (Wed Apr 9, 1:49 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 1:53 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Wed Apr 9, 4:59 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Bill Davidsen, (Wed Apr 9, 5:52 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Apr 9, 6:40 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 2:57 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 7:30 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Grant Grundler, (Thu Apr 10, 10:55 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Apr 10, 11:04 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 11:26 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 11:29 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu Apr 10, 12:27 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Chris Friesen, (Thu Apr 10, 2:20 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:23 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix (was: Re: [ ..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Thu Apr 10, 2:35 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Randy Dunlap, (Thu Apr 10, 2:44 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Philip Craig, (Thu Apr 10, 5:46 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Andi Kleen, (Fri Apr 11, 12:54 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 1:59 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 4:26 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 4:30 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 4:36 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Apr 11, 5:16 am)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Chris Friesen, (Fri Apr 11, 8:40 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 9:22 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Apr 11, 9:45 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Martin Mares, (Fri Apr 11, 10:10 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Kok, Auke, (Fri Apr 11, 10:26 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 10:34 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 10:53 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 11:51 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 12:01 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 12:25 pm)

Re: [regression] e1000e broke e1000, Willy Tarreau, (Fri Apr 11, 12:29 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Matthew Wilcox, (Fri Apr 11, 12:38 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 1:21 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Krzysztof Halasa, (Fri Apr 11, 1:22 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 1:29 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Dan Noe, (Fri Apr 11, 2:01 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 3:06 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 3:21 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Apr 11, 4:00 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 4:05 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Apr 11, 4:15 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Jeff Garzik, (Fri Apr 11, 4:43 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, david, (Fri Apr 11, 4:58 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Apr 12, 6:07 am)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Apr 13, 2:13 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ondrej Zary, (Sun Apr 13, 2:34 pm)

Re: [patch] e1000=y && e1000e=m regression fix, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Jun 9, 12:24 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Eric Sandeen	Re: [PATCH] xfs: do not pass unused params to xfs_flush_pages
Daniel Hazelton	Re: x86: 4kstacks default
Rusty Russell	Re: 2.6.22-rc3-mm1
Jeffrey V. Merkey	Re: Versioning file system
Matt Mackall	Re: [RFD] Documentation/HOWTO translated into Japanese
linux-netdev:
gregkh	Patch "IPv6: keep route for tentative address" has been added to the 2.6.34-stable...
Patrick McHardy	Re: [rfc 02/13] [RFC 02/13] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sip: Add callid parser
Krzysztof Oledzki	Re: Error: an inet prefix is expected rather than "0/0".
Paul Gortmaker	[PATCH net-next 09/16] tipc: Relocate trivial link status functions to header file
webmaster Maintenance	&#32852;&#31995;&#31995;&#32479;&#31649;&#29702;&#21592;
git:
Johannes Schindelin	[PATCH] fetch: refuse to fetch into the current branch in a non-bare repository
Junio C Hamano	Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly
Oliver Kullmann	Re: how to move with history?
Alex Riesen	Re: git exclude patterns for directory
Andreas Ericsson	Re: why not TortoiseGit
openbsd-misc:
Damien Miller	Re: Patching a SSH 'Weakness'
Stuart Henderson	Re: Apache Seg Fault after upgrade to 4.6 stable
Úlfar M. E. Johnson	installing openbsd in xen
Brian	CARP multicast and ADSL bridge
Eric Furman	Re: Defending OpenBSD Performance
git-commits-head:
Linux Kernel Mailing List	New device ID for sc92031 [1088:2031]
Linux Kernel Mailing List	drivers/acpi: use kasprintf
Linux Kernel Mailing List	Staging: et131x: prune all the debug code
Linux Kernel Mailing List	PCI: introduce pci_pcie_cap()
Linux Kernel Mailing List	USB: g_multi: Multifunction Composite Gadget added

Colocation donated by:

Syndicate