Re: debug Kconfig option (was Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2008 - 2:51 am

* Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de> wrote:


it's great stuff! I very much think it's fine in lib/Kconfig.debug - we 
need prominence of debugging options. (they are used way too 
infrequently)

My only suggestion would be to move the new entry below the existing 
firewire entry (PROVIDE_OHCI1394_DMA_INIT) there - which also happens to 
avoid this particular merge conflict.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 1:53 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Wed Apr 9, 9:55 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 5:45 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Apr 9, 11:52 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Apr 10, 12:44 am)
debug Kconfig option (was Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9), Stefan Richter, (Thu Apr 10, 12:52 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 2:48 am)
Re: debug Kconfig option (was Re: linux-next: Tree for Apr ..., Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 2:51 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Thu Apr 10, 12:02 pm)