login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
April
»
10
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...>, Andi Kleen <ak@...>, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...>, <akpm@...>
Subject:
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 - 8:47 pm
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
quoted text
> > Ok. Sorry, it's been a few months since we looked at this. So the =q > opcode lets the compiler choose instructions with or without REX prefix. > We can allow this because > > - We don't need the opcode length in the stop_machine_run() version > - we support variable length opcode in the nmi-safe version > > Am I remembering correctly now ? >
Yes. Both =r and =q allow REX opcodes. -hpa --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Apr 9, 11:08 am)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Apr 9, 2:01 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (updat...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Apr 9, 4:21 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (updat...
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Apr 9, 6:33 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization (updat...
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Apr 9, 7:15 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Apr 9, 3:08 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Apr 9, 6:33 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, Mathieu Desnoyers
, (Wed Apr 9, 8:42 pm)
Re: [patch 13/17] Immediate Values - x86 Optimization
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Wed Apr 9, 8:47 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Amit K. Arora
[RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Chuck Ebbert
Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
0 users
and
429 guests
online.
Syndicate