Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linux-next@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Linus <torvalds@...>
Date: Wednesday, April 9, 2008 - 8:45 pm

Hi Stefan,

On Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:55:42 +0200 Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.d=
e> wrote:

Actually, no, as sched/for-akpm gets rebased sometimes.  I only have to
fix these trivial conflicts once as "git rerere" remembers the fix for me
and they are so trivial that Linus will probably fix them the same way
when he finally merges your tree.  Also, there is the possibility that he
will merge your tree before sched/for-akpm ...

--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 4:53 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Wed Apr 9, 12:55 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 2:52 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu Apr 10, 3:44 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Apr 10, 5:48 am)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stefan Richter, (Thu Apr 10, 3:02 pm)
Re: linux-next: Tree for April 9, Stephen Rothwell, (Wed Apr 9, 8:45 pm)