login
Header Space

 
 

Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: <wli@...>, <lethal@...>, <linux-sh@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 7:26 pm

On 4/1/08, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:

So the problem is that SH3 is allowed to enable
HUGETLB_PAGE/HUGETLBFS, but only SH4/5 define the HPAGE_SHIFT macro,
due to some #ifdeffery on the hugepage size. So either the choice
needs to be extended to include CPU_SH3 (which builds here, when
changed) or the HUGETLBFS conditional needs to depend more
specifically on SH4/5 and not just SUPERH. I think the arch maintainer
has to make that call, as I don't know the hardware to say if SH3
actually supports multiple hugepage sizes.

Thanks,
Nish
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Apr 1, 6:58 pm)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Nish Aravamudan, (Tue Apr 1, 7:26 pm)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Paul Mundt, (Wed Apr 2, 4:04 am)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Nishanth Aravamudan, (Wed Apr 2, 6:55 pm)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Dave Hansen, (Wed Apr 2, 8:06 pm)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Paul Mundt, (Thu Apr 3, 1:48 am)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Mel Gorman, (Wed Apr 2, 6:15 am)
Re: HugeTLB vs. SH3 cpu, Paul Mundt, (Thu Apr 3, 1:52 am)
speck-geostationary