Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@...>, lkml <linux-kernel@...>, <daniel@...>, <lizf@...>, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2008 - 6:07 pm

Quoting Pavel Machek (pavel@ucw.cz):

If we go with the decision that properly isolated containers will
always require an LSM then I can go with that.  But IMO such a
decision needs agreement by all the players.  So far it seems there
is only calls from one objector.

Eric, I don't recall - was it your opinion that an LSM was an ok
short-term solution, or that it was in fact an ok long-term solution?

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Serge E. Hallyn, (Wed Mar 26, 2:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Serge E. Hallyn, (Mon Mar 31, 10:00 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Serge E. Hallyn, (Tue Apr 1, 6:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Alexey Dobriyan, (Tue Apr 1, 8:34 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 27, 5:04 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Mar 27, 12:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/1] cgroups: implement device whitelist (v6), Serge E. Hallyn, (Thu Mar 27, 1:37 pm)